The Yemen attack was planned under the Obama administration. This attack was not about killing Yemeni citizens or even Al Qaeda terrorists, but about gathering intelligence on Al Qaeda’s plans to attack the United States and kill American citizens.

Obama did not plan the attack; Individuals within the national security establishment planned this based on prior intelligence that was gathered through contacts, most likely Yemen Houthi Shia.

During the attack, the United States suffered a casualty, Special Warfare Officer William “Ryan” Owens, whose body was transported to Dover Air Force Base, where a respectful President Donald Trump wanted to pay tribute to the soldier and his family. . The father, Bill Owens, refused to meet with President Trump and demanded an investigation into why this attack took place only three weeks after the Trump administration.

The attack was carried out because it had already been planned and was planned for a reason that was independent of politics. What the father should have considered, having been a soldier himself, is that politics should not play a role in national security. If Obama thought the situation warranted operational planning and Trump administration officials agreed with Obama’s assessment, then politics probably had little to do with the motive for the attack.

This is where it gets really weird when you consider the facts rather than the media using the pain of a parent to discredit and disrespect President Trump. The media has made it clear that this father is now wondering why the United States government decided to send his son in danger, but what about the thousands of people who died under the Bush regime’s war in Iraq, who rushed under the deliberately false claim that Saddam was responsible for the 9/11 attacks and had weapons of mass destruction? How does this sailor’s father think his son’s death deserves more consideration than the 4,500 who died in Bush’s illegal invasion of Iraq not to mention the 2,500 soldiers who died in Iraq and Afghanistan where Barak Obama expanded the war?

Suddenly, the media want to question the war and seem more concerned about the death of one person than all the deaths that occurred under Bush and Obama. Are Americans really stupid enough to indulge in this kind of nonsense? If there was ever going to be an investigation, it should be into how Clinton and Obama destroyed Libya under the claims that Gaddafi intended to kill his own people and had rape squads that he was giving Viagra to when everyone knew they were. Forces fighting Gaddafi were jihadists sent by Saudi Arabia when the entire country was raped by the Takfiri threat that is now waging a war against Assad in Syria. What also needs to be investigated are Clinton’s lies when he denied any knowledge that weapons were being looted from Libya to hand over to jihadists in Syria.

Bill Owens, after his son died, questioned why there were no Americans on the ground in Yemen for two years before Trump put on what he called a “great display.” First, I would hardly call a small foray that was barely covered by the media a great display of American military might. Second, why didn’t you wonder why we had troops on the ground before that two-year period? If you decide to become a commando, worrying about where you are sent to fight doesn’t even show up as a signal on the radar screen. You become a commando because you want the prestige and excitement of being sent on missions that your government considers in the vital interests of national security.

When Wikileaks offers to give Americans the truth about what their elected officials do and why they do it, many Americans want to blindly trust their government and say the government needs to keep secrets as if ignorance suddenly becomes a virtue. It seems that all Democrats despise Wikileaks and Assange for telling them the truth about how corrupt Hillary Clinton and the DNC were and how corrupt a Clinton presidency would have been. It was clear to everyone that Obama wanted to become an agent of change by promoting his “smart” war in Afghanistan as opposed to Bush’s “dumb” war in Afghanistan. Obama then proceeded to turn to Iraq and transfer forces to Afghanistan. It was clear to everyone that Obama promoted the war in Afghanistan to make the Obama presidency markedly different from what everyone knew had already become a strategic failure during the Bush presidency. His decision to expand the war in Afghanistan was clearly made for political reasons. Trying to separate politics from war is impossible because war is simply the continuation of politics by different means.

So all Trump did was decide not to interfere with Obama’s plan and be persuaded by the arguments of both his and Obama administrations and the national security complex. In other words, it was an executive decision. If you had decided to wait longer, as Bill Owens alludes, because you were only in office for three weeks, would you have made it less of a political decision or more of a political decision? So the question is: How long should I have decided to wait so that it didn’t seem like a political decision? Or let’s take this logic a step further and try to discern when it would not have been a political decision. It seems that if those with the specific knowledge decided it was a good idea and Trump made a promise to keep Americans safe, then the decision to act should have been made immediately. This line of reasoning from Bill Owens raises the question of why we are allies of Saudi Arabia knowing that it was they who inspired and financed the 9/11 attacks. Why was Obama supporting the Saudis in their cruel and criminal war against Yemen in which the Saudis have massacred civilians by the tens of thousands and starved millions to death? Why do we support the Saudi jihadists in Syria? Why do we attack Syrian positions and force Russia to institute a no-fly zone in its area of ​​operations, so that the US government knows that more hostile acts will result in the downing of US warplanes by the acclaimed Triumf S400 anti-aircraft missile? as it placed America in the humiliating position of being dictated by the Russian military.

The most important question I have is why I, an elementary school gym teacher, can solve those questions that no one ever asked in the media. Why has the media suddenly become preoccupied with raising war-related issues when for the past 16 years a question was seldom posed and no objection ever voiced?

Bill Owens has stated that there was no target in Yemen worth an American life. While this may be true, I can say that there was certainly no target in Iraq or Afghanistan that was worth trillions of dollars and the loss of thousands of American lives. So, it seems to me that we got very cheap with Trump. And how does this father know who the targets were, what information was obtained, and what threat was removed? To say that his son’s life was not worth killing an Al Qaeda operative would make the whole issue of fighting Al Qaeda not a beginning. In fact, the reason a nation pays to keep warriors is that if a thousand have to die to save a few, this sacrifice is borne by those who knowingly and willingly undertake such an obligation.

The fact that Bill Owens now says that this government owes his son an investigation reduces the sacrifice of every American family that has lost loved ones in the US government’s war against the Greater Middle East. The people do not owe any tribute to the military, because it is the American people who make up the military. It is the military that owes the American people who choose to serve. I say this as a retired military man. And, before any American is put in jeopardy, what must be done is for the media to bring the truth to the American people and ask the tough questions designed to get to that truth. What the military owes the American people is the best equipment, training, and leadership it can provide. What the American people owe to themselves is a government that places the interests of the American people above illegal aliens, refugees resulting from ill-conceived and useless wars, profits from the military-industrial complex, and the globalists they want to pursue. hegemony for power.

Although Bill Owens did not want his son’s death to be a political photoshoot for Trump, it seems that MSM have managed to turn this death into another opportunity to poke fun at Trump as a means of stopping his agenda. Trump’s agenda thus far has been to keep the promises he made to the average American. It is an agenda for which you will have to constantly fight against those whose interests are not those of the American people. Both the elite and the opposition parties have their supporters within the deep state. We see supporters within the FBI, CIA, and NSA as they leak information, provide disinformation, and commit treason. Anyone caught committing such misdeeds must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, while the FBI, CIA and NSA conduct a thorough cleaning of the house.

In the meantime, Trump should continue to attack the media, ignoring media that he knows are already hostile to him. You need to keep exposing these organizations as the propaganda arm they are for liberals, globalists, the military-industrial complex, and the state of war. His exit from the White House Press Corps dinner is a great first shot through the bow. If the media had provided the truth to the American people, we would never have elected those who have won power. Instead, we had to trust Wikileaks to find out the truth. This is why MSM hate Assange. The one thing that those in power don’t want is for the American people to really know what is going on. The American people have discovered the MSM game and are no longer willing to play it. They have finally disconnected from the media and are laughing when Trump mocks CNN, the New York Times and the Washington Post. What a breath